Noopept vs Semax: side-by-side comparison
Omberacetam · N-phenylacetyl-L-prolylglycine ethyl ester · GVS-111
A synthetic dipeptide (N-phenylacetyl-L-prolylglycine ethyl ester) developed in Russia and promoted as a nootropic. It is a prodrug of cyclic glycine-proline (cycloprolylglycine) and is an analog of piracetam. It is not FDA-approved; human evidence is limited.
ACTH(4-7)-PGP · N-Acetyl Semax · NASA (N-Acetyl Semax Amidate)
A synthetic heptapeptide (Met-Glu-His-Phe-Pro-Gly-Pro) derived from ACTH(4-10) with a Pro-Gly-Pro tail for stability. Primary nootropic with cognitive enhancement, focus, and neuroprotection. Significantly upregulates BDNF (1.4x protein, up to 3x mRNA per Dolotov et al. 2006) and modulates NGF expression. Unlike full ACTH, it lacks steroidogenic (adrenal) and melanocyte-stimulating activity, so it does not produce cortisol/HPA stimulation or tanning; some more recent reviews suggest it may still interact with central MC4/MC5 melanocortin receptors, so "no melanocortin activity at all" overstates current evidence. Available as standard Semax, N-Acetyl Semax, and NASA (Amidate) - each progressively more stable.
1 / 10 natty scale / 1
Different class, same goal
Noopept is an other; Semax is a peptide. They overlap on health, so the cost side below is where they actually separate.
The tape
Core ratings
The same three rulers every entry on the site is scored with, read head to head.
Natty scale
1 natural · 10 heavy
Effectiveness
Documented effect · of 5Δ1
Side-effect severity
Documented burden · of 5
Cost side
Body-load fingerprint
Where each one actually lands its strain, on the calculator's thirteen channels. Tap a row for what it means and which labs track it.
Systemic
Bars show strain at each one's typical protocol, not your dose. ≈ marks values inferred from side-effect data or category rather than hand-graded. For your numbers, run the calculator.
Logistics
The vitals
Benefit side
What each is for
Shared goals carry both dots; a goal with one dot belongs to that side alone.
Run for
Documented upside
- Reported cognitive/memory support (mostly subjective / preclinical basis)
- Preclinical BDNF increase via its cycloprolylglycine metabolite
- Active at low doses (10-30mg/day)
- Widely used nootropic where legal (e.g. OTC in Russia)
Run for
Documented upside
- Upregulates BDNF (1.4x protein, up to 3x mRNA) and modulates NGF expression
- Improved memory, learning, and attention
- Neuroprotective effects demonstrated in stroke models
- Lacks the steroidogenic/melanocyte-stimulating activity of full ACTH (no tanning, no cortisol/HPA stimulation)
- Russian clinical approval with human study data
The downsides
Side effects, aligned
Each entry's documented side effects, sorted onto the same body systems so the gaps and the overlaps are visible. Tap any effect for the detail.
The exit
Hormonal fallout & recovery
What each does to your own hormone axis while on, and what leaving it costs.
Noopept
Not a hormone and does not affect the HPTA. No PCT required.
Semax
Does not affect HPT axis. No HPA axis suppression documented. No PCT required. No interference with hormone panels.
Read-out
How they separate
- 01
Enhancement
They land at almost the same point on the natty scale (1/10 vs 1/10): a similar distance beyond natural.
- 02
Coming off
Neither requires PCT: both leave the natural testosterone axis running.
- 03
Logistics
Noopept runs as oral, Semax as nasal spray; typical runs are 4-8 weeks vs 2-4 weeks.
Generated from each entry's data file. Descriptive, not a recommendation; nothing here is medical advice.