DNP vs Stenabolic: side-by-side comparison
2,4-Dinitrophenol · Dinitrophenol
A mitochondrial toxin that uncouples oxidative phosphorylation, creating pure heat from calories. Extremely effective for fat loss but potentially lethal.
SR9009 · SR-9009
A Rev-Erb agonist that improves metabolic rate and circadian rhythms. Enhances exercise capacity and metabolism without affecting hormones.
6 / 10 natty scale / 5
Same lane
Both sit in the same class and are run for cutting. This is a like-for-like comparison: read the gaps as real trade-offs.
The tape
Core ratings
The same three rulers every entry on the site is scored with, read head to head.
Natty scale
1 natural · 10 heavyΔ1
Effectiveness
Documented effect · of 5Δ1.5
Side-effect severity
Documented burden · of 5Δ3
Cost side
Body-load fingerprint
Where each one actually lands its strain, on the calculator's thirteen channels. Tap a row for what it means and which labs track it.
Cardiometabolic
Organ strain
Systemic
Bars show strain at each one's typical protocol, not your dose. ≈ marks values inferred from side-effect data or category rather than hand-graded. For your numbers, run the calculator.
Logistics
The vitals
Benefit side
What each is for
Shared goals carry both dots; a goal with one dot belongs to that side alone.
Run for
Documented upside
- Most effective fat burner known
- Works regardless of diet or activity
- No tolerance develops
- No hormonal effects
Run for
Documented upside
- Increased metabolism
- Enhanced exercise capacity
- No hormonal effects
- May improve sleep patterns
- Fat loss support
The downsides
Side effects, aligned
Each entry's documented side effects, sorted onto the same body systems so the gaps and the overlaps are visible. Tap any effect for the detail.
The exit
Hormonal fallout & recovery
What each does to your own hormone axis while on, and what leaving it costs.
DNP
Not hormonal. No PCT required.
Stenabolic
Not hormonal. No PCT required.
Read-out
How they separate
- 01
Enhancement
DNP sits 1 point higher on the natty scale (6/10 vs 5/10): a bigger step beyond natural at its typical protocol.
- 02
Side-effect bill
DNP's documented side-effect severity is heavier (5/5 vs 2/5). The body-load fingerprint above shows where that weight actually lands.
- 03
Body load
The widest gap at typical protocols is blood pressure (DNP 7.8/10 vs 0/10), then mood & sleep (DNP 6/10 vs 0/10).
- 04
Coming off
Neither requires PCT: both leave the natural testosterone axis running.
- 05
Logistics
typical runs are 1-2 weeks vs 6-8 weeks.
- 06
Tested athletes
Both are WADA-prohibited: neither belongs anywhere near tested competition.
Generated from each entry's data file. Descriptive, not a recommendation; nothing here is medical advice.